Out of each of the furniture items, the chair may be the imperative one. While most of the other forms (except the bed) are meant to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair is meant to be viewed here in the largest sense, from stool to throne to complex pieces such as a bench and sofa, which should be regarded as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently labeled.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not just a physical support and/or aesthetic piece; it historically is symbolic of social hierarchy. In the historical royal courts there were clear connotations between being seated on a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but without arms, or having to make do with a stool. During the last century, a director’s and manager’s chair has risen a symbol of superior status, as well as in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a raised platform.
In its furniture purpose, the chair holds a number of different models. There are chairs designed to suit man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). Since past days there were chairs used for birth (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). There are chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can have chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has derived new chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair types have been adapted to fit to evolving human needs. Because of its close association with man, the chair appears to its full meaning only when in employ. Whereas it makes no difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers whether there is anything inside or not, a chair is seen best and tested with a person sitting on it, because chair and sitter complement the other. Thus the various elements of the chair are named according to the names of our human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the primary purpose of a chair is to support the body, its credit is evaluated principally on how well it fulfills this practical use. In the design of the chair, the designer is restricted under particular static laws and principal measurements. Inside these restrictions, however, the chair builder has great freedom.
The history of the chair extended over a period of several thousand years. There existed civilizations that made unique chair forms, as expressions of the principal work in the spheres of skill and design. Among such peoples, special note needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the structures of careful craft, are seen from discoveries made in tombs. First of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The iconic Egyptian chair has four legs structured like those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, with a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. In this way a durable triangular design was made. There appeared to be no significant variation in the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical citizens. The general variation was in the brand of ornamentation, in the evidence of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was manufactured for an easily carried seat for soldiers. As a camp stool this type persevered until much later days. But the stool also then was created as the use of a ceremonial seat, its original function as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can from today’s evidence be noted, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the shape of folding stools but can not be folded as the seats were formed from wood. The simple build of the folding stool, composed of two frames that turn on metal bolts and bear a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, is seen again but some time later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better recognised of this form is the folding stool, of ashwood, which can now be seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not in any ancient specimen still extant but as found in a variety of pictorial material. The better known is the klismos posited on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground near Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of these legs were shown. These strange legs were thought to be executed of bent wood and were therefore had to bear huge pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints joining the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore super solid and were visibly pointed out.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek chair; designs of models of seated Romans offer evidence of a heavier and apparently somewhat crudely crafted klismos. Both features, the light or heavy, were popularised as part of the Classicist epoch. The klismos style is found in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in some forms of profound originality around Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China is not able to be followed as far back as the history of chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full series of sketches and paintings has been preserved, detailing the insides and exteriors of Chinese houses and the designs of furniture. Another preservation since the 16th century are a trove of chairs made of wood or lacquered wood, that display an interesting resemblance to designs of ancient chairs.
Like in Egypt, there were two iconic chair forms in China: a chair with four legs and a folding stool. This chair has been seen both with and without arms but never without a square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to firm the back. In one style, however, the stiles are slightly curved on top of the arms so as to suit the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of its chairback). All three sections were mortised on the yoke-like top rail. Although the innovation of a back splat had a foundation for English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that would only to a restricted capability reinforce corner joints (and were loose additionally) indicate an element particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which stops around the rounded staves. Each member is round in section or have rounded edges—referable maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and had on occasion a plaited texture. These chairs needed the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for when too much weight is pushed on the back, the chair has a tendency to fall. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this epoch armchairs presumably were kept for elderly members of the family, for they were given great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is thought to have travelled to China from the West. It does not differ much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a change in that the top rail is elegantly fixed to the two legs of the stool by a curved member, which is usually provided with metal mounts. From a Western perspective the resulting effect of these furniture forms is stylized. The structure and aesthetic aspects are combined in a manner that is all at once naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is an upshot of the manner that the individual items do not look to have been adjoined by means of either glue or screws, but are mortised on one another and locked into its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also had its name on the chair. Artworks show a kind of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between the layers, stitched to bring out a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a related board at the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was a portable piece of furniture for traveling which, at the same time, had the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair is found in engravings of interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this design of chair might also be seen in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not held that the form actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slender dimensions; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is clearly a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in impressive amounts, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of these chairs lined up by a wall. The design asserts itself with its shapely proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that was, as progressed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The model owes such popularity to a combination of relaxation and elegance. The seat suits to the human body and grants a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Typically the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions made between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are stable, constructed on craftsmanlike methodology even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof are constructed from wood of quite thick density; but all the members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been sanded away, and finer chairs would be further embellished with special delicate and decorative engraving. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is used for any upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used rather than upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more variable in form than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and was popular in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became well-known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content